Ressources pour un Monde Meilleur: écologie, bonheur, vie, art, esprit, livres, musiques, films...
Livres et Romans: Le monde merveilleux des Eolis -- De la science fiction actuelle: Dumria 3D, Araukan, Typheren, Ken, Pourquoi Papa -- Tolkien: Rêve Elfique -- Les Elfes du Dauriath -- Un gros projet 3D -- Manifeste des mondes virtuels -- Vivons notre idéal dans les mondes virtuels 3D! -- Elf Dream, l'idéal elfique
Réagir: L'heure d'été (forum1) -- Droits de l'enfant violés en France -- Tabac et alcool sont des drogues -- Internet et liberté -- Logiciels buggués -- Epidémies nouvelles et hygiène de base -- Racisme et sexisme à rebours -- Une bonne constitution pour l'Europe? -- Devoir de mémoire -- Génération plombée? -- Comment devenir végé! -- Arnaques à l'E85
Cette expérience fait partie de la recherche SETI ou exobiologie. Elle visait à savoir si la photosynthèse est possible sur une planète de naine rouge extrême comme l'étoile Trappist. Il suffisait de cultiver des plantes terrestres avec pour seule source de lumière une lampe sous-voltée imitant la lumière de Trappist. Le résultat a été que mes radis «extraterrestres» ont bien poussé, allant jusqu'à faire des fleurs. Mais pas de bulbes, de sorte qu'ils avaient l'air vraiment extraterrestres...
Cette expérience ne met pas en jeu de physique extraordinaire ni de machines à un milliard d'Euros. Pourtant elle fournit une information précieuse: toutes les étoiles sont susceptibles d'héberger une vie basée sur la photosynthèse. A ce titre, j'ai pensé que cette contribution méritait d'être connue et mise en valeur sous la forme d'un papier scientifique, avec peer referee et publication dans une revue spécialisée.
C'est là que le bât blesse: je n'ai reçu aucunne réponse. Même pas de rejet: juste rien. Bon, c'est dommage pour un résultat si intéressant, mais ce n'est pas quelque chose que je puisse résoudre. Je publie donc cette étude ici, comme un résultat de mon «Université Shedrupling». Depuis vingt ans que ce site existe il devrait être archi-connu (Il a été créé avant Google, c'est tout dire). Et au hasard, si vous faites partie d'une revue scientifique à commité de lecture, il n'est pas trop tard.
Voici donc le texte, en se rappelant qu'il est prévu pour faire un papier scientifique. Mais cela n'implique pas qu'il soit moche, aussi j'ai appliqué les même styles que pour le reste de ce site. Voir la version rituelle en .pdf. Et le corps du texte est en anglais, désolé. Je peux traduire si il y a une demande.
Attention: ceci est une soumission de papier, qui n'a pas bénéficié d'un comité de lecture (peers review).
©Richard Trigaux 2018
La découverte de plusieurs planètes dans la zone Goldilock autour de l'étoile ultra-froide Trappist-1 suggère que les planètes de naines rouges pourraient être nombreuses dans l'univers qui nous entoure. Cela pose la question de savoir si une vie intelligente est possible sur de telles planètes. Un des éléments de la réponse est de savoir si la photosynthèse est possible avec de telles étoiles froides, car la photosynthèse semble être un préalable indispensable à une vie évoluée. L'expérience était simple à faire: construire un simulateur de lumière de Trappist-1, et essayer de faire pousser des plantes de la Terre avec cette lumière. Cela a bien fonctionné et le poids de matière sèche après sept semaines de croissance était 25 fois supérieur au poids des graines. Ainsi, les étoiles naines rouges les plus froides ne sont pas exclues de la vie intelligente, en ce qui concerne le critère de la photosynthèse. Nous réfléchissons également à la possibilité d'un chemin d'évolution Darwinien vers une chlorophylle adaptée à la lumière proche infrarouge. Enfin, une conclusion intéressante est qu'une chlorophylle adaptée à l'infrarouge aurait une signature spectrale différente de la chlorophylle terrestre, contraignant la recherche de la vie par des moyens optiques ou spectraux.
Trappist, Trappist-1, exoplanète, exobiologie, vie extraterrestre, SETI, photosynthèse
Evolved life necessarily uses some sort or another of muscles, and brain. Both are high consumers of energy. This requires a large energy source widely available in the biosphere. The only one fulfilling this criteria is solar light.
This makes that photosynthesis is a very strong prerequisite for intelligent life on any planet. Photosynthesis produces simultaneously a fuel and an oxidizer, which arrive to intelligent organisms by separate paths. On Earth, the hydrocarbon fuel arrives by food, and is stored in the body. Oxygen is massively available in the air. This situation allows for the fast availability of energy, without having to store both reactants (Organism storing both would be high explosives). But other combinations would work too, like a hydrocarbons atmosphere and nitrates food.
Problem, photosynthesis uses high energy photons, above 800 nanometres on Earth. This already makes only some percent of the Sun Light energy available for photosynthesis, and this proportion is much weaker with red dwarf stars. We can consider that organisms on red dwarf stars would adapt to use infrared photons, but this hypothesis cannot be checked simply. We shall discuss further this possibility, but in theory only.
The proposed experiment here is to see if the few energetic photons in Trappist-1s star allow for the growth of Earth plants. If the reply is yes, this sets a substantially higher value to the ne factor of the Drake formula.
The experiment uses a Trappist light simulator, which is the only light source for a cultivation test of a common Earth plant.
Trappist-1 being at 2512°K, and the budget of the experiment being near the absolute zero, the simple solution was to use an incandescence light bulb, suitably derated to reach this temperature. Both the bulb and the star being good approximations of a black body, the two spectra were matching well enough. Actually this was not so simple: after buying the last incandescence bulbs in shop before their interdiction, I ran in another difficulty: impossible to put a hand on a thermocolorimeter. The closest was 150kms away, in a photography school in Toulouse, and they understandably won't let an amateur use it.
So the solution was to use a derating curve, giving the color temperature as a power law of the voltage: color temperature is approximately proportional to V at a power of 0.42 (Fink and Beaty, ). Of course this curve is such that we get the rated color temperature at the nominal voltage.
The bulbs were two halogen incandescence bulbs, Branded Osram, type HALOLUX T 40 W 230 V E14, intended for domestic use. They are rated for 40W and 2700°K at 230 Volts. Because of this low wattage, two were used.
The above derating formula gives 194V feeding voltage to reach Trappist-1 temperature. However, without direct control on the color temperature, the errors of the voltmeter (Metrix 202B, given at 2.5% accuracy on alternating current), unpredictable changes in the network voltage (from 232V to 236V, after the previous voltmeter) and an unspecified inaccuracy on the derating formula, the target voltage was finally chosen at 176V, supposed to give a temperature of 2400°K, that is 4.6% lower. This way, all the inaccuracies are on the same side, and even in the worse case the conclusions will remain valid.
A dimmer could not be used to lower the voltage, since it would not provide a sinusoidal waveform, making the voltmeter reading not valid. For this reason, a ceramic rheostat was used instead: 25 Ohms, 25 watts, in series with the two bulbs (mounted in parallel together). This rheostat was enclosed in an earthed box for safety, and junctions made in a standard derivation box, including banana jacks for the voltmeter.
By the way, if anybody tries to reproduce this experiment, I recommend using a regulated DC voltage source for the lamps, and to calibrate the temperature with... quite simply one of the spectrometers used to measure the temperatures of stars. Indeed, thermocolorimeters used in photography may finally be less accurate than the setting of this experiment (for instance one of the best available today, Sekonic C-700R, has its accuracy not specified).
At this point, a test plant had to be selected. Since nearby all plants have the same cutoff wavelength near 800 nanometres, any could be used. A practical choice was radishes, often used for their fast growth in children learning: «radis de 18 jours» (18 days radishes), half long, brand Delbard, batch number 10G GC1108, expiry date 07/2021 (experiment made in 2018).
A dark enclosure was needed too. But the lamps were producing a lot of heat, so that the experiment finally landed in a dark cupboard instead. The two bulbs had an aluminum foil reflector, and were placed at about 15cm above the earth level in the cultivation tray. This excess of heat compared to light must certainly be a real problem on a red dwarf's planet: either illuminated and too hot, or tepid but dark. This is the reason why infrared photosynthesis must be a definitive advantage.
After seven weeks of cultivation, the plants were uprooted, carefully washed from any earth, dried, put in three equal paper envelopes, and brought to a pharmacy for weighing:
-1 envelope with 10 plants: 7.16 gr
-1 envelope with 100 seeds: 5.50 gr
-1 empty envelope for tare: 4.43 gr
This makes that, in average, each radish created 25.5 times the weight of its original seed, as a result of an efficient photosynthesis, without any other possible cause. Even one of them had flower buds. For comparison, it is said that plants grown in the dark die after some days.
The results were curious, though: none developed a bulb. Instead, they developed stems, which usually do not exist in radishes. One of those radishes had developed more than all the others together, 70cms of stems, with even a branching!
Figure 1 shows the record radish (folded):
We can interpret this result as a «low light mode» or «light search mode», that we usually do not see in radishes. It finally elected not to develop a bulb, keeping its low energy supply for reproduction only. Plants living on a red dwarf planet will certainly experience similar difficulties, and overcome them in various ways.
This result does not allow do derive any absolute value to any factor of the Drake formula. But it brings a relative change to one of the factors: ne, the proportion of planets which can harbor life.
Indeed, we can consider the proportions of stars as follow:
-4 % of blue stars, which have too short a life, so that we do not count them in ne.
-20% of Sun-like stars, usually considered as propitious to life, without restriction
-76% of red dwarves, which habitability is questioned.
(Brown dwarves are not counted here, as their percentage is unknown, and probably not very high)
These figures show that ne with all the red dwarves is 4.8 times higher than ne with only Sun-like stars.
This translates as our closest inhabited neighbor being 1.69 times closer (statistically of course).
A figure which also brings several years closer the predictions for finding intelligent life (by whichever method).
On a planet of a red dwarf star, at equal temperature and infrared heat received from the star, there is much less useful light energy available for photosynthesis. For this reason, infrared photosynthesis could bring a real advantage, by capturing more useful energy. We reflect here if such a thing is «technically» possible.
Normally, only energetic photons can break molecules like H20 or CO2. What makes photosynthesis possible on Earth is the very lucky fact that four photons can combine their action to break two H20 molecules into 02 and 4 H+. This allows to use photons of half the required energy.
Photosynthesis energy transfers happen in a diagram called Z-scheme, shown in Figure 2 (after Rajni Govindjee ), with the Redox potential as ordinate:
The voltages levels are (likely) determined by the difference of potentials between the different compartments of the cell. The two vertical upward jumps (grey) are determined by the energy of the photons, while the vertical drops are determined by the energy consumed by each endothermic chemical reaction.
Seen from the eye of an electric technician, this diagram shows a flaw in this system: in Photosystem II, only a part of the difference of potential energy created by the photon capture is used to break the water molecules. The remainder is used for ancillary functions, or lost in transfers. This is important from the point of view of infrared photosynthesis: we can consider different diagrams, where the whole available difference of potential is used only for breaking the water molecules, and a separate photosystem powers the ancillary functions. A possible alternate diagram is shown in Figure 3:
This alternate diagram allows for photons of as low energy as 1120 nanometres to be used, which are clearly in the infrared. Even 1500 nanometres photons can contribute to part of the energy.
This is a temptative diagram, using Earth chemistry, but a different architecture of the cells, with different difference of potential between the compartments of the cells. We can imagine many other diagrams, with different chemistry, and different potentials. Our point here is just to show one which can be expected to work, energy-wise (or voltages-wise).
On Earth, photosynthesis quickly evolved in the Archean age, finding ways to break harder and harder molecules. Date of first oxygen is debated, between 2500 and 3500 millions years ago (This covers about the whole Archean age). But since, photosynthesis did not changed further, save for minor color changes in the molecules. Such kind of situation indicates a deadlock in evolution, as it reached an optimum. There could be other optimums, for instance in the infrared. But evolution cannot go backward, to try again to find a better path. On Earth it did not needed anyway, since the found solution was working.
However in red dwarves's planets, we can conceive that there is a much higher selective pressure toward infrared photosynthesis. So if a solution exists, like the modified Z-scheme above, it is more likely to be selected by a standard evolutionary process, as soon as the equivalent of the Archean age on this planet.
The problem here is that, the more we go in the infrared, the more the atmosphere is opaque. In water, this is even worse (IR absorption curve, after Chaplin, Martin, ).
At 1000 nanometres, infrared light is absorbed in a dozen meters.
At 2000 nanometres, infrared light is absorbed in only part of a meter.
At 3000 nanometres, infrared is absorbed in millimeters.
This continues until as low energy as the millimeters wavelength: water is very opaque to anything save very near infrared.
Since life must appear in water, at a minimum depth of some meters (to account with the presence of waves and tides), this brings a cutoff frequency to infrared photosynthesis at something like 1500 nanometres. To give an idea, the small absorption of visible red light in water is already enough to constrain the living depth of photosynthetic organisms on Earth (Chaplin, Martin, ). So infrared must be much more constraining.
It is worth noting that on Earth, plants all appear white in infrared, since they accept no photons there. This has an influence on the Darwinian evolution of vision: there is no point at seeing in the infrared, since everything looks the same. However on a planet with infrared photosynthesis, it is likely that plants have different colors in the infrared. So there is a point to have infrared eye cells, and even a need.
This is worth knowing, when we shall be able to detect vegetation with a telescope: On Earth, detection of plants from space uses their conspicuous infrared signature. But this signature is not necessarily valid on a red dwarf planet.
But if we go farther in the infrared, water becomes strongly colored and even opaque. The air itself would be colored with moisture. So that vision reaches about the same limits than photosynthesis.
The experiment shows that photosynthesis is possible on any red dwarf star. This makes that all red dwarf stars can be target for any search for evolved extraterrestrial life, by whichever method including SETI. This statistically brings our closest neighbor 1.69 times closer.
The possibility of an infrared photosynthesis seems limited to the close infrared (around 1500 nanometres), for several reasons. While probable, and a definite advantage, it is not mandatory for intelligent life.
At last, a Chlorophyll adapted to infrared would have a very different spectral signature in the near infrared (800 to 1500 nanometres). Especially it would lack the obvious luminosity of Earth plants at these wavelengths. This signature would be shifted beyond 1500 nanometres, and this constrains the methods to find extraterrestrial life, either by direct observation or with spectrometry.
Ref. 1. Donald G. Fink and H. Wayne Beaty, Standard Handbook for Electrical Engineers, Eleventh Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978, ISBN 0-07-020974-X, pg 22–8
Ref. 2. Rajni Govindjee,"The Z-Scheme Diagram of Photosynthesis" AT Illinois
Ref. 3. Chaplin, Martin, "Water Absorption Spectrum", London South Bank University
Page about this publication, and possible follow-up:
(Internet resources being volatile, I encourage everybody to keep record of this page).