FIRST PART: LOGIC
Basic recall: With logic, the consciousness states affirmations over objects, then do reasoning to deduct other statements about other objects.
The axioms of the Sets Theory, far from being absolute basis, results from some given choices which already induce the results we expect to be demonstrated from the Sets Theory. So Aristotelian logic is only for objects clearly separated from each other, and also which properties can always be stated perfectly true or perfectly false.
Objects with other sets of properties lead to other logics: graduated, fuzzy, non-dual, Yin-Yang dialectic...
This is a non-Aristotelian logic I discovered, which is very powerful. In a Yin-Yang dialectic, we introduce a notion of progressive harmonisation between the two terms, thus making two axes, one Yin-Yang horizontal, and one good/bad vertical. In numerous very concrete social, psychological... problems, (commented examples) this approach is able to remove many confusions, which generate conflicts and suffering.
Axis confusion©, undiscernment among reciprocal situations© or homonymous situations©, diagram construction mistakes and other errors lead to a variety of subtle problems in society, politics, ethics, spirituality... Understanding of quadripolar logic may quickly allay many sufferings.
Quadripolar logic, despite of being in another formal system, deserves the full statute of a whole logic, as well as Aristotelian logic, and its daily uses may be as important and numerous.
What does determine which logic is to be used? Each of them matches with different sets of properties of objects in reality, on which we can check if it is efficient or not, valid or not. In History, various cultures and tradition in the world developed various logics, but each of these gifts belongs to the whole mankind.
All kinds of logics are equally rational and objective when correctly applied onto the matching objects for which they are valid. Beliefs, distortions and psychological limitations are not means to seek for reality neither for truth, they are not «logics». However notions of rationality or objectivity are questioned, so that we need to discuss their exact meaning. The psychological bias©. As a similar problem also occurs in the discussion on epistemology, the main part of this discussion is in the second part.
A transcendent reality cannot be completely appropriated with an unique conceptual system. Several systems, with different axioms or logics, are indispensable to give an approximate but comprehensive enough understanding of such a reality. Example: The notion of God, psychology, Buddhist studies.
The different logics all exhibit cases where we cannot state what will happen: paradoxes, actualising indeterminism©... Reality obeying to such systems must get some fix to however behave in a way or another.
Why such expressions as «It is logical» «war logic» «heart logic» are inaccurate or abusive.
The simplified version of the same book: PECULIAR EPISTEMOLOGY
Ideas, texts, drawings and realization: Richard Trigaux.
Legal notice and copyright Unless otherwise noted (© sign in the navigation bar) or legal exception (pastiches, examples, quotes...), all the texts, graphics, characters, names, animations, sounds, melodies, programming, cursors, symbols of this site are copyright of their author and right owner, Richard Trigaux. Thanks not to mirror this site, unless it disappears. Thanks not to copy the content of this site beyond private use, quotes, samples, building a link. Benevolent links welcome. No commercial use. If you desire to make a serious commercial use, please contact me. Any use, modification, overtaking of elements of this site or the presented worlds in a way deprecating my work, my philosophy or generaly recognized moral rules, may result into law suit.